2026 수능특강 7강. 제목 파악 한줄해석,단어,문제 pdf

7 제목.pdf

0.13MB

A. 요지, 주제, 제목이란?

 

1. 요지 (Main Idea)

정의: 글의 중심 내용을 간결하게 요약한 것.

특징: 글 전체의 핵심 메시지를 한 문장 또는 짧은 문단으로 압축. 구체적이고 명확하게 표현됨. 글의 목적, 주장, 결론을 포함.

예시 지문: "셀피는 자기 초상화의 역사를 확장하고 강화한 현대적 형태로, 외적 이미지와 내적 감정 사이의 긴장을 드러내며 새로운 시대의 시각적 서명이 되었다."

요지: "셀피는 자기 초상화의 현대적 진화로, 외적 표현과 내적 감정의 긴장을 보여주며 새로운 시대의 문화적 상징이 되었다."

 

 

2. 주제 (Theme)

정의: 글에서 다루는 중심 주제나 큰 틀의 이야기.

특징: 글의 전반적인 내용을 포괄하는 넓은 개념. 추상적이고 일반적임. 글의 목적이나 메시지를 간접적으로 암시.

예시 지문: "셀피는 자기 초상화의 역사를 확장하고 강화한 현대적 형태로, 외적 이미지와 내적 감정 사이의 긴장을 드러내며 새로운 시대의 시각적 서명이 되었다."

주제: "셀피의 문화적 의미와 자기 초상화의 역사적 발전."

 

 

3. 제목 (Title)

정의: 글의 내용을 간략하게 나타내는 짧은 문구.

특징: 글의 핵심을 간결하고 흥미롭게 표현. 독자의 관심을 끌도록 설계됨. 주제나 요지를 암시하지만, 직접적으로 설명하지는 않음.

예시 지문: "셀피는 자기 초상화의 역사를 확장하고 강화한 현대적 형태로, 외적 이미지와 내적 감정 사이의 긴장을 드러내며 새로운 시대의 시각적 서명이 되었다."

제목: "셀피: 자기 초상화의 현대적 진화와 문화적 의미" : "The Selfie: A New Era's Visual Signature"

or “Selfies, the Latest Innovation in Representing Ourselves”

 

 

 

4. 차이점 요약

구분	정의	특징	예시
요지	글의 중심 내용을 간결하게 요약.	구체적, 명확, 글의 목적과 결론 포함.	"셀피는 자기 초상화의 현대적 진화로..."
주제	글의 중심 주제나 큰 틀의 이야기.	추상적, 일반적, 글의 목적을 암시.	"셀피의 문화적 의미와 역사적 발전."
제목	글의 내용을 간략하게 나타냄.	간결, 흥미 유발, 주제나 요지를 암시.	"셀피: 자기 초상화의 현대적 진화"

 

 

 

 

26학년도 수능특강 7강. 제목파악 한줄해석, 문제, 단어 pdf

 

 

 

B. 제목추론을 위한 2025학년도 수능 24번 분석

 

1. 제목 (Title): "셀피: 자기 초상화의 현대적 진화와 문화적 의미"

("The Selfie: Modern Evolution of Self-Portrait and Its Cultural Significance")

 

2. 핵심 키워드

셀피 (Selfie)

자기 초상화 (Self-portrait)

역사적 확장 (Historical expansion)

이미지 (Image)

외적 표현과 내적 감정의 긴장 (Tension between external expression and internal emotions)

새로운 시대의 시각적 서명 (Visual signature of the new era)

 

 

3. 구조 분석

a. 서론 (1문장): 셀피가 새로운 것이 아니라 자기 초상화의 역사를 확장하고 강화한 것임을 설명.

"The selfie resonates not because it is new, but because it expresses, develops, expands, and intensifies the long history of the self-portrait."

 

b. 본론 (2~4문장):

자기 초상화의 역사적 역할 (개인의 지위를 보여주는 수단).

현대적 "이미지"의 개념 (우리가 생각하는 자신의 모습과 타인이 보는 모습의 교차점).

셀피가 드러내는 내적 감정과 외적 표현 사이의 긴장.

자기 초상화의 확장 과정에서 더 많은 사람들이 자신을 표현할 수 있게 된 점.

 

c. 결론 (마지막 문장): 오늘날 젊은 세대가 셀피를 새로운 시대의 시각적 서명으로 재해석하고 있음을 강조.

"Today’s young, urban, networked majority has reworked the history of the self-portrait to make the selfie into the first visual signature of the new era."

 

 

 

 

 

7-G

 

The selfie resonates not because it is new, but because it expresses, develops, expands, and intensifies the long history of the self-portrait. The self-portrait showed to others the status of the person depicted. In this sense, what we have come to call our own “image” — the interface of the way we think we look and the way others see us — is the first and fundamental object of global visual culture. The selfie depicts the drama of our own daily performance of ourselves in tension with our inner emotions that may or may not be expressed as we wish. At each stage of the self-portrait’s expansion, more and more people have been able to depict themselves. Today’s young, urban, networked majority has reworked the history of the self-portrait to make the selfie into the first visual signature of the new era.

 

7-1

 

Is there any more virtuous practice than eating an apple a day? Maybe not — unless it’s eating a banana instead. Don’t fall into the trap of buying the same fruits week after week just because you’re in the habit of always packing an apple for lunch, for example. A large Red Delicious might cost as much as $1, depending on the season, when an orange might cost half as much and a banana only a fourth. If that’s the case, take a minute to ask yourself: Is having an apple really worth four times as much as having a banana instead? Put another way, if your family of four substituted a less expensive banana for apples, you’d save $1,100 in a year without making any other changes to your budget and without shopping around. It’s important to note that the prices in this example are from the same supermarket. Shopping at numerous stores isn’t necessary when you know what the costs of simple substitutions are in terms of variety and size.

 

7-2

 

Punishment can be imposed by the person or group against whom the transgressor transgressed, or by a third party, or by oneself (guilt acts as a form of self-punishment). Generally, punishment carries a cost to the punisher, like the energy needed to perform the punishment, as well as some risk of revenge. Punishments that are extra dangerous or risky are considered costlier. Sometime in our distant past, we realized that mere exposure to public humiliation could be used where physical, often violent elimination from the group had previously been required. The emergence of shaming as a social option would have reduced the cost of punishment, because mere exposure that served to damage an individual’s reputation in front of the group could have negative consequences — for instance, members of the group might choose not to cooperate with the shamed individual in the future. Shaming and social exclusion are closely linked, but shaming is less costly. And unlike transparency, which exposes everyone, shaming exposes only a section of the population.

 

7-3

 

One of the greatest barriers to human understanding and communication is that we cannot see inside another person’s mind. This limitation gives rise to unintended misunderstandings and allows people to employ all sorts of deceptive strategies, both consciously and unconsciously. Some of the ways digital technology is helping us overcome this barrier include various means of truth (or lie) detection, multimodal communications, and digital readouts of our own and others’ brain waves. Already, researchers at Carnegie Mellon University (CMU), using digital computer analyses of brain patterns captured by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scans, are able to tell what a person is thinking about. It is likely, according to these researchers, that our children will, in their lifetimes, be able to read people’s thoughts and even have access to direct brain-to-brain communication. While these developments will clearly raise ethical issues and privacy questions that will have to be addressed, there can be little doubt that as people gain access to and learn to take into account others’ unspoken motives, thoughts, needs, and judgments in their own thinking, their wisdom will increase.

 

7-4

 

In his Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle used the example of a builder and a shoemaker to demonstrate an important point. If the builder constructs a house for the shoemaker, then the shoemaker must pay for the work in shoes. “But to determine how many shoes will be paid to the builder, a proportional equality must be established between the goods, and then reciprocity effected. Only then will the fair exchange be realized. But if there is no proportionality, the exchange is not equal and fair and will not hold together.” The builder would not have need of as many pairs of shoes necessary to compensate him. This is where money enters. It serves as a proportional medium of exchange. The proper proportion of shoes to the house in money terms makes the deal just. It is not simply a pricing mechanism but must be capable of producing well-being as well. “Thus, money acts like a measure: it makes goods commensurable and equalizes them. For just as there is no community without exchange, there is no exchange without equality and no equality without commensurability.”