206학년도 수능특강 5강, 함축적 의미추론. 한줄해석, 단어, 문제 pdf : 학생들의 비판적 사고력과 문맥 이해력을 측정하기 위해 pdf

함축적 의미추론의 특징: 학생들의 비판적 사고력과 문맥 이해력을 측정하기 위해

1. 암시된 의미 파악:

글쓴이가 직접적으로 말하지 않았지만, 문맥을 통해 유추할 수 있는 의미를 찾는 것입니다.

예: "She sighed deeply and looked out the window." → 이 문장은 그녀가 슬프거나 불안해한다는 것을 암시할 수 있습니다.

2. 글쓴이의 의도나 태도 이해:

글쓴이가 특정 주제에 대해 어떻게 생각하는지, 어떤 목적으로 글을 썼는지 등을 파악합니다.

예: 글이 비판적, 지지적, 중립적인 태도를 보이는지 추론합니다.

3. 문맥적 추론:

주어진 단어나 문장이 전체 지문에서 어떤 역할을 하는지, 어떤 의미를 내포하는지 분석합니다.

예: "The government's new policy, though well-intentioned, has faced backlash." → 정책의 의도는 좋았지만 결과는 부정적임을 암시합니다.

4. 논리적 결론 도출:

지문의 정보를 바탁으로 논리적으로 결론을 이끌어냅니다.

예: "Many species are disappearing due to habitat destruction." → 환경 보호의 중요성을 암시합니다.

<지문에서 단계적 접근 전략>

STEP 1: 글의 핵심 문장을 통해 요지를 파악한다.

"Marcus Vitruvius Pollio, a practicing architect during the rule of Augustus Caesar, recognized that architecture requires both practical and theoretical knowledge, and he listed the disciplines he felt the aspiring architect should master: literature and writing, draftsmanship, mathematics, history, philosophy, music, medicine, law, and astronomy — a curriculum that still has much to recommend it."

이 문장은 건축가가 되기 위해서는 실용적인 기술과 이론적 지식이 모두 필요하며, 다양한 학문을 통합적으로 이해해야 한다는 점을 강조하고 있습니다. Vitruvius는 건축가가 단순히 기술만 익히거나 이론만 공부하는 것이 아니라, 두 가지를 모두 균형 있게 갖추어야 한다고 주장합니다.

STEP 2: 글의 전체 흐름을 파악한다.

글은 로마 제국 시대에 건축가의 지위가 상승했음을 언급하며, 건축이 정치적 선언으로서 중요한 상징적 의미를 갖게 되었다고 설명합니다. Cicero는 건축가를 의사와 교사와 동등한 위치에 놓았고, Vitruvius는 건축을 매우 중요한 전문직으로 여겼습니다. Vitruvius는 건축가가 다양한 학문을 통달해야 한다고 주장하며, 실용적 기술과 이론적 지식을 모두 갖추는 것이 중요하다고 강조합니다. 그는 실용적 기술만 익히거나 이론만 공부하는 것은 불완전하다고 지적하며, 두 가지를 모두 갖춰야 진정한 권위를 얻을 수 있다고 말합니다.

STEP 3: 글의 요지와 관련하여 밑줄 친 부분의 함축적인 의미를 추론한다.

"hunting the shadow, not the substance"라는 표현은 글의 요지와 밀접하게 관련되어 있습니다. 이 표현은 Vitruvius가 건축가가 실용적 기술과 이론적 지식을 모두 갖추어야 한다는 점을 강조하는 맥락에서 사용되었습니다.

 

**"Shadow"**는 이론적 지식이나 학문적 지식을 상징합니다. 이는 실체가 없는 것처럼 보이지만, 실제로는 중요한 기반을 제공합니다.

 

**"Substance"**는 실용적 기술이나 실제 적용 가능한 지식을 상징합니다. 이는 실체가 있고, 실제로 건축물을 설계하고 건설하는 데 직접적으로 기여합니다.

따라서 "hunting the shadow, not the substance"는 이론만 추구하고 실용적 기술을 소홀히 하는 것을 비유적으로 표현한 것입니다. 이는 이론만으로는 실제 건축물을 설계하고 건설하는 데 필요한 실질적인 능력을 갖추지 못한다는 것을 의미합니다. 반대로, 실용적 기술만 익히고 이론적 지식을 소홀히 하는 것도 불완전하다는 점을 강조합니다.

STEP 4: 결론

"hunting the shadow, not the substance"는 이론적 지식만 추구하고 실용적 기술을 소홀히 하는 것은 실체를 놓치는 것과 같다는 함축적 의미를 담고 있습니다. Vitruvius는 건축가가 이론과 실용적 기술을 모두 균형 있게 갖추어야 진정한 권위를 얻을 수 있다고 주장하며, 이 표현은 그런 맥락에서 사용되었습니다. 즉, 이론과 실용적 기술의 조화가 중요하다는 메시지를 전달하고 있습니다.

 

206학년도 수능특강 5강, 함축적 의미추론 한줄해석, 단어 문제 pdf

5강, 함축적 의미추론.pdf

0.12MB

 

5-G

The position of the architect rose during the Roman Empire, as architecture symbolically became a particularly important political statement. Cicero classed the architect with the physician and the teacher and Vitruvius spoke of “so great a profession as this.” Marcus Vitruvius Pollio, a practicing architect during the rule of Augustus Caesar, recognized that architecture requires both practical and theoretical knowledge, and he listed the disciplines he felt the aspiring architect should master: literature and writing, draftsmanship, mathematics, history, philosophy, music, medicine, law, and astronomy — a curriculum that still has much to recommend it. All of this study was necessary, he argued, because architects who have aimed at acquiring manual skill without scholarship have never been able to reach a position of authority to correspond to their plans, while those who have relied only upon theories and scholarship were obviously “hunting the shadow, not the substance.”

 

5-1

 

There’s a saying that there are no cultural relativists at thirty thousand feet. The laws of aerodynamics work regardless of political or social prejudices, and they are indisputably true. Yes, you can discuss to what extent they are an approximation, what are their limits of validity, do they take into account such details as quantum entanglement or unified field theory (of course they don’t). But the most basic scientific concept that is clearly and disturbingly missing from today’s social and political discourse is the concept that some questions have correct and clear answers. Such questions can be called “scientific” and their answers represent truth. Scientific questions are not easy to ask. Their answers can be validated by experiment or observation, and they can be used to improve your life, create jobs and technologies, save the planet. You don’t need pollsters or randomized trials to determine if a parachute works. You need an understanding of the facts of aerodynamics and the methodology to do experiments.

 

5-2

 

When a community stopped hunting female wild cattle, those herds would, over time, tolerate the closer presence of humans. By watching the wild cattle, as our deep ancestors watched predators and learned about their lives, these more recent ancestors could have begun to understand the life cycle of the wild cattle and made a few risky, but creative, ventures. They started bringing a few, as youngsters, into the villages, building pens and trying to keep them alive, and they succeeded. They’d been watching the cattle across generations — they knew about their life cycles, shared that information with one another, and collaboratively came up with ideas about raising their own cattle — and thus prey domestication was born. Once cattle, sheep, pigs, llamas, and goats were living with humans, it was a simple task to do, like with dogs, a bit of behavioral and morphological shaping via direct manipulation (for wool, milk production, or rapid growth for meat).

 

The selection of specific individuals to breed was an initial step toward modern domestic animals. And hamburgers.

 

5-3

 

The primary impetus of scientific and technical innovation has been our increased ability to reach out and exchange ideas with others, as well as to borrow other people’s ideas, and blend them with our own to create something new. Combinatorial creativity is the acknowledgment that nothing is genuinely unique, at least not in the sense of being constructed entirely from scratch. That notion is met with considerable resistance in creative spaces. To create is to start with a blank canvas. However, much data exists to support this ecosystem of influences and inspirations. Nina Paley, an artist, shot and animated ancient relics from the Metropolitan Museum of Art to illustrate her point that all creation is derivative. Every work of art is a derivative work. In animation, Oliver Laric examines the reappropriation of images in his video essay “Versions” by looking at how Disney recycles animation. Creativity is the original open-source code.

 

5-4

 

Freud long ago distinguished between the conscious and the unconscious minds. But today’s understanding of the unconscious mind is not Freud’s seething unconsciousness, with its repressed impulses and instincts. It’s a cooler and bigger information processing system. Our memory, thinking, language, attitudes, and perceptions all operate on these two tracks — a conscious, deliberate “high road” and an unconscious, automatic “low road.” Our high-road mind is reflective; our low-road mind is intuitive. Consider driving:

 

Your brain and hands know how to move into the right lane. But if you are like most drivers, you can’t consciously explain how you do it. Most drivers say they would turn right, then straighten out. But that would steer them off the road. Actually, after moving right, you reverse the steering wheel equally to the left of center, and only then return to the center position. But no worries, your low-road-guided hands know how to do it.